Mystery dater

mid-30's, single, some say attractive, now in chicago. the trials and tribulations of dating from my perspective.

Sunday, January 21, 2007

the trouble with online dating

(i've been trying this theory out on a few of you lately, so forgive me if this feels redundant!)

let's start with a story.

a friend arranges a date for two of his friends. they meet. both are excited, intrigued by the other person, attracted to them. but both are a little hesitant -- does s/he think this is a date? does s/he think i'm attractive? is s/he having as much fun as i am?

after the date, one friend calls the matchmaker with praise. "you know me really well to set me up with that person, s/he was wonderful, but i'm just not sure s/he knew it was a date..."

other friend calls matchmaker. "wow, i really liked him/her, s/he was great, but i really don't think s/he was into me..."

enter matchmaking friend, who calls each of them and says, "you guys are idiots, you were both totally attracted to each other, now you take it from here!"

et voila, date #2 is arranged with much anticipation from both parties. (thanks for the anecdote, G, helped crystallize this idea that's been floating around my head for a while.)

maybe the moral of this story is clear. had these two individuals met online, who knows if they would have progressed to the second date. perhaps, both being great communicators and people who are willing to take risks, one or both would have reached out, but who knows?

but that's the thing with the internet. there's no intermediary. there's no matchmaker, no yenta. odds are those of us who are over 30 have been through at least one heartbreak, so we can be a little gun shy when it comes to making ourselves vulnerable to other people. so we often hold back a little, keeping our cards close to our respective chests. if both people do that, you can have a bit of a stalemate, and that nudge from the friend in common, the co-worker, the sibling, whoever, can be just what's needed.

and then there is the accountability piece as i've called it. when you just see someone's picture online, you don't know them or their friends or their coworkers or their siblings or whatever, then you have no sense of accountability beyond what you feel naturally toward people you don't know. it's so easy to be flaky, to blow people off, to be inconsistent, to not say thank you, whatever, because people online have no recourse. it seems to be an unwritten rule of online dating that anything goes and it's not acceptable to ask why...or at least if you do, you may not get a response.

i know people have met their beloved online, and that's great. but statistically speaking, you are still more likely to meet your mate through a friend or family member, at work, or at school. and i'm increasingly understanding why. that social glue is really important, and there's even some interesting sociological theory relevant to this (which also applies to job searching, go here if you are interested).

so i'm feeling like the lack of social glue makes online dating a total crapshoot. perhaps you'll get lucky and meet someone wonderful...either the chemistry will be obvious to you both, or one person will be willing to take a chance and let their interest be known. but when i look around my friends and the relationships they are in, looks like maybe 1 in 10 met online. the others met through a friend/colleague in common, they went to high school together, they met in their old neighborhood and the guy's brother gave just enough of a nudge to make things happen, i introduced them at a halloween party, they went to college together and ran into each other there several years later...and so on.

so if you know me, and you know someone interesting and cute and smart you think i might connect with, please feel free to let me know. in the meantime, i'll leave my profile up online, but i won't put all of my faith there.

~md

4 Comments:

  • At 10:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    What strikes me about this story is that both parties were so unsure of themselves. Had either of the two been more self-confident and less self-conscious (read: able to be in the moment) they would have realized there was nothing to lose and at the end of the night said something like: 'you know, i really wasn't sure what to expect or whether i should even think of this as a date... but i kinda like your style, so i'm gonna call it a date.' And with a sly smile, added 'and i'm gonna call you soon to set up another one.'

    One of my least favorite moments of movie history (and also one of the several that made me cry, ridiculously enough) was during Jerry Maguire when he says "You complete me." The Greeks believed (well some of them at least) that we were originally a very different looking race with four arms, four legs, two sets of reproductive parts - sometimes matching, sometimes not - etc. At some point, predictably, we upset the gods and as punishment were split in half and cursed to live a mortal life of anguished searching for our other, perfect half.

    It's a cute story, and I don't mind telling it. But I have issue with the idea that love completes us. I know plenty of pretty incomplete people in love, and I know at least a couple relatively whole peeps who are otherwise unattached. I think the goal is to be complete unto yourself, then find someone who compliments your life well and makes it all that much more interesting.

    Which is all a particularly long and roundabout way to say that while I agree online dating isn't ideal, I think at some point we each have some work left to do on ourselves. You've got to have enough confidence and self-awareness to go for it, be it in a supermarket, blockbuster, the office, or online.

    It's not just about meeting someone either. Let's say the two people from the story eventually hit it off and, over time, get serious. Both will need to become a little less timid and more assertive if the relationship is to work as well as it might.

    At least that's how it works in my imagination.

     
  • At 10:34 PM, Blogger j said…

    e,

    (not to be confused with E, dear readers!) i agree with much of what you say. i guess the tricky part for me has been being on the receiving end of much of this unsure behavior, and due to the nature of the internet or other blind-dating type things, i don't often get the opportunity to express myself...or if i ask for some honest feedback, i often don't get it. perhaps that means i need to pursue more self-confident guys, but that quality can be hard to pick up through a computer screen (in fact, i think i'm learning that quality can be easy to exaggerate online).

    i'm not looking to be completed -- i have wonderful friends and family, a great job, a lovely home that i own, some pretty fancy degrees. but i am a relational person, meaning i'm my best in interpersonal situations and i'd love to explore that with a true partner. and there's that pesky 33 year old instinct i have to procreate, which i'm willing to do on my own but would rather not if given the option.

    i'm committed to continuing to work on myself and my confidence, and i know i have a lot to be proud of and thankful for. but unfortunately it can get shaken a bit when faced with all these bizarre behaviors that i detail on this blog, while other folks i love seem to be finding their complement.

    perhaps that just means it will be all the much sweeter for me when it happens...or i'll discover there are other realities which can be just as fulfilling.

    stay tuned...

     
  • At 10:44 PM, Blogger j said…

    ps, if this is the e i think this is...i guess what i'm saying goes something like this:

    "The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." ~Bertrand Russell

    -know what i mean? : )

     
  • At 2:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    haha, yes, and I know what you mean.

    I might pretend to have answers, occasionally, but I'm still all questions.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home